Fair
61°FFairFull Forecast

Norcross: Get government out of the pension business

Published: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:30 a.m. CDT

Detroit has become the largest U.S. city to crumble under the weight of huge, unfunded public employee benefits such as pensions and retirement health care. It is unlikely to be the last: Recent bond-rating downgrades in Chicago and Cincinnati indicate more municipalities could be forced to seek bankruptcy protection.

While it is too late to save Detroit, it may still be possible to prevent similar disasters from unfolding elsewhere by ending our long-standing practice of putting state and local governments in charge of pensions.

Public-sector plans are in peril because pensions are essentially mere promises that are paid for years or even decades after they are made. A politician can woo votes by promising benefits today, knowing very well that after he or she has left office, someone else has to figure out how to pay the bill. This opens the door to plan mismanagement, flawed accounting assumptions and disingenuous politics.

The Secure Annuities for Employees Retirement Act of 2013 – a proposal by Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah – would address this fundamental flaw: It would give state and local governments the option of getting out of the pension business while letting employees keep the benefits they earned.

Instead of governments managing defined-benefit plans and investing assets, the plan would let municipal or state employers purchase a portable annuity from an insurance company that would manage and invest the funds and deliver retirees’ monthly checks.

One of the biggest advantages for both public employees and taxpayers is there would be no more accounting shell games or unrealistic assumptions about the future performance of the economy. Governments would have to face the bill and fund employee benefits fully by paying the insurance company upfront. Public employees would own the annuity as they earn it and wouldn’t have to bank on the promises of politicians or budgetary vagaries. And taxpayers would no longer have to fear a sudden pension crisis that requires raising taxes or cutting services.

Detroit is no anomaly. State and local pension plans are repeating the same mistakes across the United States. Consider this example: Since the late 1990s, New Jersey has periodically granted itself a “pension holiday,” skipping or reducing contributions as a form of “budgetary relief.” Today, the state has an unfunded liability of $173 billion.

With accurate, market-based prices on plan annuities, state and local governments could no longer hide behind accounting subterfuges to make these inflated promises look affordable. The price of these annuities would be publicly disclosed and transform pension-funding policies from a pass-the-buck nightmare to a single bill paid by employers when services are rendered.

It may be that the best candidates for this change are governments that have relatively well-funded plans that won’t be in critical mode in the short term. In the end, the economics will catch up to all public-sector plans. The goal for policy makers should be to avoid making the same accounting and political mistakes that undercut the safe retirements of public- sector workers.

Get governments out of the pension business, and give employees the certainty that they will receive the benefits they earned.

• Eileen Norcross is a senior research fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. Roman Hardgrave is the director of online strategies at the Mercatus Center.

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Daily Chronicle.

Watch Now

Player embeded on all DDC instances for analytics purposes.

Week 6 - 3 Point Stance

More videos »

Reader Poll

Have you seen farm equipment on the road yet this fall?
Yes
No

You have already taken part in this poll.

Show results