Overcast
74°FOvercastFull Forecast

Attention turns to vote-counting on immigration

Published: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:53 a.m. CDT • Updated: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 9:56 a.m. CDT
Caption
(J. Scott Applewhite)
Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn of Texas, accompanied by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Ky., gestures as he speaks with reporters about the Immigration Bill following a Republican strategy session on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 11, 2013. An amendment announced by Cornyn would require 100 percent monitoring of the entire U.S.-Mexico border and 90 percent of would-be crossers to be stopped or turned back before anyone can get a permanent resident green card. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

WASHINGTON – Backers of far-reaching immigration legislation are turning their attention to courting support and counting votes after the Senate pushed the contentious bill over early procedural hurdles.

Two votes to place the bill formally before the Senate and open for amendments each drew more than 80 votes Tuesday, reflecting a bipartisan desire to debate the legislation to remake the nation's immigration laws and open the door to citizenship to millions.

Despite the lopsided votes, Republicans served notice they will seek to toughen the bill's border security provisions and impose tougher terms on those seeking to gain legal status. "This bill has serious flaws," said their party leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

A vote was possible Wednesday on an amendment by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, to prohibit anyone from taking the first steps toward citizenship until the secretary of Homeland Security has certified to Congress that the U.S.-Mexico border has been under control for six months, according to Grassley's office. The measure is opposed by Democrats and some Republican backers of the bill.

At the White House, President Barack Obama insisted the "moment is now" to give the estimated 11 million immigrants living in the United States illegally a chance at citizenship and prodded Congress to send him a bill by fall.

At its core, the bill sets out a 13-year journey to citizenship for the millions of immigrants who arrived in the country illegally through the end of 2011 or who overstayed their visas. The bill also requires a tighter border to prevent future illegal immigration, and makes the path to citizenship contingent on certain border security goals, or "triggers," being met.

Other key provisions would create a new program for low-skilled workers to enter the country and expand the number of visas for high-skilled workers who are particularly in demand in technology firms.

Supporters expressed confidence they could muster the 60 votes needed for the bill to overcome Republican stalling tactics and pass the Senate by July Fourth. Democrats control 54 Senate votes, and Republicans 46. But a number of opponents said success was far from assured.

And some key supporters including Sens. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., are looking for closer to 70 votes on final passage to show resounding momentum for the bill and pressure the Republican-led House to act.

To that end, the bill's four Democratic and four Republican authors were looking for ways to accept Republican amendments on border security and other issues that could win over additional supporters — without making the path to citizenship so onerous that Democratic support is threatened. Some outside advocates and Democrats including Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., have cautioned that making too many concessions to Republicans could weaken core provisions of the bill, and have argued that it's more important to get a strong bill with 60 votes than a weaker one with 70.

"Our goal now is to pass the strongest legislation possible with as many votes as possible while staying true to our principles, then await what the House is going to do," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Wednesday on the Senate floor.

"I believe some Republicans with no intention of voting for the final bill, no intention, regardless of how it's amended, seek to offer amendments with the sole purpose of derailing this vital reform."

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a potential 2016 Republican presidential contender and the author of the bill with the strongest ties to conservatives, said that about half the Senate's Republicans might be prepared to back the measure — but only with stronger border provisions.

An early skirmish took shape over a proposal by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas. It would permit the legalization process to begin but require several changes before anyone currently in the country illegally could receive a green card that confers permanent legal residence.

Those changes include apprehension of at least 90 percent of those seeking to cross into the United States at every segment of the southern border, implementation of a biometric exit system at all airports and seaports of entry and a nationwide E-Verify system to check the legal status of prospective employees.

Democratic supporters of the legislation have deemed Cornyn's plan a "poison pill," designed to wreck the bill's chances for passage instead of enhance them. But the Texan told reporters he had some leverage to force changes, if nothing else.

"I think if they had 60 votes to pass a bill out of the Senate, they probably wouldn't be talking to me. And they are," Cornyn said of majority Democrats.

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page

Get breaking and town-specific news sent to your phone. Sign up for text alerts from the Daily Chronicle.

Watch Now

Player embeded on all DDC instances for analytics purposes.

DeKalb High School ALS Ice Bucket Challenge

More videos »

Reader Poll

Do you think you spent a greater portion of your income on your children than your parents spent on you?
Yes
No
Don't have children