Digital Access

Digital Access
Access from all your digital devices and receive breaking news and updates from around the area.

Home Delivery

Home Delivery
Local news, prep sports, Chicago sports, local and regional entertainment, business, home and lifestyle, food, classified and more!

Text Alerts

Text Alerts
Choose your news! Select the text alerts you want to receive: breaking news, prep sports scores, school closings, weather, and more.

Email Newsletters

Email Newsletters
We'll deliver news & updates to your inbox. Sign up for free e-newsletters today.

Review: ‘Jack the Giant Slayer’ a pleasure to watch

If not for its PG-13 rating, “Jack the Giant Slayer” would be an old-fashioned, family-oriented fantasy adventure, the type that local television stations used to run on Sunday afternoons.

Just a few edits would have guaranteed a PG, but that rating is considered uncool these days. Parents wondering if this is appropriate viewing for their children should take the PG-13 under advisement. The main reason for the rating is a particularly grotesque, almost comical, death of a giant near the end of the film, and like almost all of the film’s violence, it is rendered in CGI.

The rating aside, Bryan Singer confidently captures the earnest spirit of such! mildly scary family features as “Jason and the Argonauts” and “The Seventh Voyage of Sinbad.” Those classics had Ray Harryhausen’s stop-motion creatures and “Jack” has CGI giants. The giants aren’t especially realistic, but neither were the skeletons in “Jason,” and 50-plus years on, that fight at the end remains a thrilling special effects sequence.

Nicholas Hoult, recently seen as an undead Romeo in “Warm Bodies,” plays the title role in the adventure, which is much more a retelling of “Jack and the Beanstalk” than “Jack the Giant Slayer.” The confusion is understandable. Both are old English folk tales involving a hero named Jack and giants, and Mickey Mouse did star in versions of both. But “Jack and the Beanstalk” sounds like a kids movie, and “Jack the Giant Slayer” sounds like an action movie, so now you know why the producers picked which title.

The script, credited to Darren Lemke, Dan Studney and Singer! ’s “Usual Suspects” collaborator Christopher McQuarrie, takes the beanstalk legend and layers in some palace intrigue and a Disney-like subplot about a runaway princess (Eleanor Tomlinson) who falls in love with peasant boy Jack.

The princess, Eleanor, has been betrothed to a much older suitor, Roderick. We know he is a conniving weasel because he is played by Stanley Tucci with an arch English accent. The kind-hearted king (Ian McShane) wishes his daughter would behave, but she keeps disguising herself as a commoner and running off.

A storm arises during one of her escapades, so the princess seeks refuge in the shanty home of Jack, who recently acquired some “special” beans in a transaction familiar from the fairy tale. Jack’s infuriated uncle already has thrown away the beans, and one has settled beneath the house. When rain water activates the legume, a towering stalk carries the cabin into the sky, taking the princess with! it.

In this telling of the tale, a war between men and giants occurred generations earlier, so everyone in the kingdom already knows about magic beanstalks and the land of giants above the clouds (which makes it curious that Jack doesn’t suspect the offer of “special” beans). The king dispatches his finest soldiers to climb the beanstalk and save his daughter from the hungry giants. Jack and the scheming Roderick, who knows a few secrets about the giants, tag along because otherwise there wouldn’t be a movie.

From this point on, “Jack” plays out like the original “Star Wars” in ren faire costume. To save a princess, a farm boy goes on a perilous mission led by a venerable knight played by genuine Obi Wan Kenobi Ewan McGregor, who actually says, “I’m getting an awfully bad feeling about this.” The “awfully” must have been thrown in to prevent George Lucas from suing for plagiarism.

“Jack” may not be original, but it is fun. These days, t! oo many makers of big-budget action movies seem so embarrassed by their material, they try to prove there are above it – and the audience – with a snarky attitude. “Jack” is not without a sense of humor, but Singer takes the story at face value, magic beans and all, and the cast plays it straight. I enjoyed how McGregor casually says, “Tally ho,” before leaping into action.

Holt and Tomlinson are charming as the young heroes, and Tomlinson looks dynamite when she dons Joan of Arc armor toward the end. The giants are fearsome villains, with Bill Nighy playing their two-headed leader (a two-headed giant is one of the few elements from the “Giant Slayer” legend).

The giants eventually invade the smaller kingdom below, which leads to much big action at the end. Too much, probably. The problem with CGI is that when kingdoms and creatures can be whipped up and manipulated inside a computer, filmmakers have no limitations! except for money, and studios are still willing to pour a fortune into these things. Go back 20 years, and when directors orchestrated action-packed finales, they had to use stunt performers, model buildings and soundstages – elements with physical limitations.

This forced filmmakers to focus their storytelling into specific action beats. With CGI, you get the feeling that filmmakers keep telling the programmers, “And it would be cool if one of the giants ripped the sails off a windmill and threw them like a Frisbee!” They keep adding, pushing the climax past the point where the viewer gets exhausted. “Jack” is nearly two hours long, which is merciful by the standards of other blockbusters, but it is at least 10 minutes too long.

For all that, “Jack the Giant Slayer” is Singer’s best film since the second “X-Men” movie. It is charming, exciting and unashamed of its corny virtues. Someday, it will go down easy on a lazy Sunday afternoon.

Loading more