Obama frees 10 states from No Child Left Behind
|
|
| Massachusetts Education Secretary Paul Reville observes Brittany Barboso (left) and Marcus DaSilva solving math problems Wednesday in their sixth-grade class at Roosevelt Middle School in New Bedford, Mass. Reville said Thursday that President Barack Obama’s waiver to free Massachusetts from some requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind law is a vote of confidence in the state’s system for identifying and improving low-performing schools. (AP photo) |
| Buy Daily Chronicle Photos » |
WASHINGTON – It could be the beginning of the end for No Child Left Behind.
The goal was lofty: Get all children up to par in math and reading by 2014. But the nation isn’t getting there, and now some states are getting out.
In a sign of what’s to come, President Barack Obama on Thursday freed 10 states from some of the landmark law’s toughest requirements. Those states, which had to commit to their own, federally approved plans, are now free to judge students with methods other than test scores. They also will be able to factor in subjects beyond reading and math.
“We can combine greater freedom with greater accountability,” Obama said from the White House. Plenty more states are bound to take him up on the offer.
While many educators and governors celebrated, congressional Republicans accused Obama of executive overreach, and education and civil rights groups questioned whether schools would get a pass on aggressively helping poor and minority children – the kids the 2002 law was primarily designed to help.
The first 10 states declared free from the education law are Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Tennessee. The only state that applied for the flexibility and did not get it, New Mexico, is working with the administration to get approval.
Twenty-eight other states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico have signaled that they, too, plan to flee the law in favor of their own plans.
The government’s action Thursday was a tacit acknowledgment the law’s main goal – getting all students up to speed in reading and math by 2014 – is not within reach.
The states excused from following the law no longer have to meet that deadline. Instead, they had to put forward plans showing they will prepare children for college and careers, set new targets for improving achievement among all students, reward the best performing schools and focus help on the ones doing the worst.
Obama said he was acting because Congress had failed to update the law despite widespread agreement it needed to be fixed.
“We’ve offered every state the same deal,” Obama said. “If you’re willing to set higher, more honest standards than the ones that were set by No Child Left Behind, then we’re going to give you the flexibility to meet those standards.”
The executive action by Obama is one of his most prominent in an ongoing campaign to act on his own where Congress is rebuffing him.
No Child Left Behind was one of President George W. Bush’s most touted domestic accomplishments, and it was passed with widespread bipartisan support in Congress. It has been up for renewal since 2007, but lawmakers have been stymied by competing priorities, disagreements over how much of a federal role there should be in schools and partisan gridlock.
Over the years, the law became increasingly unpopular. Teachers and parents complained it led to “teaching to the test.” Parents didn’t like the stigma of sending their kids to a school labeled a failure when requirements weren’t met. States, districts and schools said the law was too rigid and that they could do a better job turning around poor performance.
A common complaint was that the 2014 deadline was simply unrealistic.
As the deadline approaches, more schools are failing to meet requirements under the law, with nearly half not doing so last year, according to the Center on Education Policy. Center officials said that’s because some states have harder tests or have high numbers of immigrant and low-income children, but it’s also because the law requires states to raise the bar each year for how many children must pass.
The law requires schools to use standardized tests in math and reading to determine student progress. The waivers announced Thursday do not excuse states from those requirements but give them the freedom to use science, social studies and other subjects in their measures of student progress.
The 10 states now can include scores on college admission exams and other tests in their calculation of how schools perform. They can be excused from penalties included in the federal law but had to come up with their own set of sanctions for low-performing schools.
For example, Georgia will replace the law’s pass-or-fail with a five-star rating system and will use end-of-course tests and Advanced Placement performance in its measure of students. In Oklahoma, schools will be taken over by the state if they consistently fail to meet standards.
Not everyone applauded Thursday’s announcement.
While No Child Left Behind isn’t perfect, said Jeanne Allen, president of the Center for Education Reform, it’s thrown a valuable spotlight on problem schools. She said giving districts and states more flexibility “without firm consequence” is not reform.
“If school district power were the answer to our education woes, our nation would be soaring high above the rest of the world in achievement. It is not, and it will not, until our leaders – just as the people they serve – face both rewards and sanctions for the education systems they govern,” Allen said.
